As I said - assumptions all over the place. That's why this is always a tough topic to discuss - here are my examples.aerynsun wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:01 pm
I am not assuming the bad guy is looking straight at the light.
You are assuming you surprise the guy with the light and the bad guy is blinded.
The light is on, right, the light does not have to be pointed at the bad guy to see the light.
Especially in a home. The bad guy could see the light on a wall and moving around.
Think about it.
If you are walking on the sidewalk at night and a car comes down the street with its lights on; you do not have to be in front of the car to see the light.
You are assuming
You are assuming you surprise the guy with the light and the bad guy is blinded
- No need - pop around a corner and glance at it and you have to move out of beam. On the other hand, light is bright enough for me to see/identify you even if you are not directly in the cone. If you can see me - I can see you.
The light is on, right, the light does not have to be pointed at the bad guy to see the light:
- No and it does not need to be pointed at him for me to acquire the target either.
Especially in a home. The bad guy could see the light on a wall and moving around.
- Why am I moving around? I'm at a choke point waiting for him to enter the cone anywhere, or make a noise.
We both making valid points - which under your imagined scenario make as much sense as mine.